Robot system

ABSTRACT

A robot system capable of safely and stably holding an object with an optimum holding method and holding force. A robot control section ( 7 ) has an object information calculation section ( 21 ) for calculating, based on image information from an image processing section ( 8 ), the size and shape of an object to be held; a holding method determination section ( 22 ) for determining, based on the object information calculated, a method for holding the object; a holding execution section ( 23 ) for executing lifting of the object by the holding method determined; a sensor information processing section ( 24 ) for processing pieces of sensor information and controlling holding force, the pieces of sensor information being those obtained at the time of the execution, the processing of the pieces of sensor information being made for each combination of one or more of the pieces of information; and a holding method correction section ( 25 ) for correcting, based on the result of the processing, the pieces of sensor information, the method of holding the object.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a robot system having a robot arm witha robot hand attached thereto. More specifically, the present inventionrelates to a robot system that executes holding based on an image andsensor information.

BACKGROUND ART

In existing robot systems, an apparatus is configured so that a handdriving output signal is corrected using a touch sensor, a positionsensor, a force sensor, or a deviation sensor of a hand section. Whetheror not an object is held is determined based on outputs of theindividual sensors, thereby achieving reliable holding (e.g., refer toPatent Document 1).

Furthermore, in order to recognize the position of an object to be held,the posture and position of a hand at the time of holding the object issimulated using image information from a plurality of cameras, therelative relationship between the object to be held and the hand isevaluated based on certain indices, and an optimum posture and positionof the hand is selected based on the results of evaluation of all therelationships (e.g., refer to Patent Document 2).

FIG. 19 is an overall configuration diagram of a robot that uses theholding method according to Patent Document 1 describing the existingart.

Referring to FIG. 19, 101 denotes a robot hand, 102 denotes a sensorsignal processing section, 103 denotes a control calculator, 104 denotesa driving section, 105 denotes a force sensor, 106 denotes a positionsensor, 107 denotes a touch sensor, and 108 denotes a deviation sensor.

Now, the overall configuration of the robot that uses the holding methodaccording to Patent Document 1 will be described with reference to FIG.19.

The sensor signal processing section 102 converts signals from the fourtypes of sensors provided on the robot hand 101, i.e., the force sensor105, the position sensor 106, the touch sensor 107, and the deviationsensor 108, into signals that can be processed by the control calculator103, and sends the signals to the control calculator 103. Upon receivingthe signals regarding the status of holding an object from the sensorsignal processing section 102, the control calculator 103 correctssignals for controlling movement regarding holding of the object by therobot hand 101. The driving section 104 converts the control signalsfrom the control calculator 103 into power with which the robot hand 101can be driven, and sends the power to the driving section 104 of therobot hand 101, i.e., to the driving mechanism and motor. Furthermore,the driving section 104 supplies electric power to the four types ofsensors, i.e., the force sensor 105, the position sensor 106, the touchsensor 107, and the deviation sensor 108. At least two force sensors 105are provided, which measure reaction forces received from a held objectat the time of holding. The position sensor 106 measures the holdingspace of the object held. At least two touch sensors 107 are provided,which determine the status of touching with the object to be held. Thedeviation sensor 108 detects a deviation of the object to be held.

FIG. 20 is a control block diagram of the robot system according toPatent Document 1 describing existing art.

In FIG. 20, 109 denotes target deformation ratio setting, 110 denotesreaction force target value setting, 111 denotes deformation ratiodetermination, 112 denotes reaction force determination, A denotesreaction force target value, B denotes target deformation ratio, Cdenotes status of touching, D denotes hand position, and E denotesreaction force. Reference numerals that are the same as those in FIG. 19denote the same components as those in FIG. 19, and description thereofwill be omitted.

Now, an operation of the robot system according to Patent Document 1will be described with reference to FIG. 20.

By feedback of signals from the sensor signal processing section 102 tothe control calculator 103, it is determined whether holding has beenexecuted properly. If a deviation of the object to be held is detectedby the touch sensor 107 or the deviation sensor 108, the targetdeformation ratio setting 109 and the reaction force target valuesetting are performed again, and position control and force control areexecuted again.

FIG. 21 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of the robot systemaccording to Patent Document 2 describing existing art.

First, terms used in the flowchart in FIG. 21 will be described.

A “sum S” is obtained by finding, regarding edges in a model of a robothand in a case where models of a robot and individual components areprojected onto a camera screen, portions that are viewable without beinghidden by individual surfaces in the model of parts other than the robothand and models of the individual components of the robot, convertingthe lengths of the portions into lengths in a three-dimensional space,and summing up values of the converted lengths.

An “evaluation value P” can be expressed as P=S/M, where M is a sumobtained by converting the lengths of all the edges in the model of therobot hand into lengths in a three dimensional space and summing up thevalues of the converted lengths.

Next, individual steps in a procedure of processing by the robot systemdescribed in Patent Document 2 describing existing art will be describedin detail with reference to FIG. 21.

In step ST100, based on an image captured by a camera, a case where arobot and individual components are projected onto a screen issimulated. Next, in step ST200, the sum S is calculated and theevaluation value P is obtained. Then, in step ST300, it is checkedwhether step ST200 has been executed for all the holding positionsand/or postures. In step ST400, the evaluation values P of theindividual holding positions and/or postures are compared. Then, in stepST500, a holding position and/or posture with a maximum value of theevaluation value P is selected.

As described above, in robot systems according to existing arts, anobject is held using information of either a sensor or a camera.

Patent Document 1: Japanese Unexamined Utility Model ApplicationPublication No. 5-31887 (page 2 and FIGS. 1 and 3)Patent Document 2: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application PublicationNo. 5-150835 (pages 2 to 4 and FIG. 1)

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION Problems to be Solved by the Invention

However, in the robot system according to the existing art in PatentDocument 1, since image information is not used, a position instructionof a robot arm is not determined if an object to be held is not at apredetermined position, so that it is not possible to hold the object.

In the robot system according to the existing art in Patent Document 2,since a holding position and so forth is determined using only imageinformation, it is not possible to recognize the mass of the object tobe held. Thus, control for an optimum holding force or determination ofan optimum holding method with both arms is not performed, so that therehas been problems regarding the stability of an object held andregarding safety.

The present invention has been made in view of the problems describedabove, and it is an object thereof to provide a robot system that canhold an object safely, stably, and quickly by an optimum holding methodand holding force.

Means for Solving the Problems

In order to solve the problems described above, according to theinvention set forth in Claim 1, a robot system includes a hand sectionhaving a finger with a hand-section force sensor provided at a distalend thereof; one or more arm sections having the hand section at adistal end thereof; a trunk section having the arm sections and on whicha trunk-section force sensor is provided; a camera for measuring a shapeof an object; a robot control section for controlling movement of thearm sections; and an image processing section for processing an imageacquired by the camera; and the robot control section includes an objectinformation calculating section for calculating, based on imageinformation from the image processing section, a size and shape of theobject to be held; a holding method determining section for determining,based on the object information calculated, a method for holding theobject; a holding execution section for executing lifting of the objectby the holding method determined; a sensor information processingsection for processing pieces of sensor information and controllingholding force, the pieces of sensor information being those obtained ata time of the execution, and the processing of the pieces of sensorinformation being made for each combination of one or more of the piecesof information; and a holding method correction section for correcting,based on a result of the sensor information processing, the method forholding the object.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 2, in therobot system according to Claim 1, there is provided a storage sectionfor storing inherent attribute information regarding the object asobject data when the object is held, and maintaining the object data.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 3, in therobot system according to Claim 2, wherein the object data stored in thestorage section when the object is held is one or more pieces of dataregarding the object, such as a size, shape, mass, or shade of theobject, and data regarding a holding method.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 4, in therobot system according to Claim 1, the arm section includes anarm-section force sensor for measuring a load on the arm section, andthe robot control section controls holding force by using thearm-section force sensor in combination with the trunk-section forcesensor.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 5, in therobot system according to Claim 1, the holding method determiningsection calculates a holding position of the object to be held anddetermines a holding method based on the object information calculatedby the object information calculation section.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 6, in therobot system according to Claim 1, there is provided a moving mechanismfor moving, based on the size and shape of the object, obtained from theimage of the camera, the object to be held to a position where it iseasy to hold the object.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 7, in therobot system according to Claim 1, the robot control section includes anindicating section for determining, based on the object information,whether it is possible to hold the object, and for indicating thatholding is not possible when it is determined that holding is notpossible.

According to the invention set forth in Claim 8, in the robot systemaccording to Claim 1, the object information calculation sectionincludes an ID tag reading section for recognizing the object to be heldfrom an ID tag provided on the object.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 9, in therobot system according to Claim 1, the method for holding the object,executed by the holding execution section, is holding with three fingersof one hand, holding with five fingers of one hand, or holding withentire one hand in a case where the number of the arm sections provided,having the hand section with five fingers, is one, and holding withthree fingers of one hand, holding with five fingers of one hand,holding with entire one hand, holding with entire both hands, or holdingwith entire both arms in a case where the number of the arm sectionsprovided, having the hand section with five fingers, is two.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 10, in therobot system according to Claim 1, the robot control section includes anobject movement processing section for selecting a part of the robotused for movement, that is, the hand section, the arm section, or amoving mechanism for moving a main unit of the robot in a case where themoving mechanism is provided, in accordance with an amount of movementof the object when the object is held and moved.

According to the invention set forth in Claim 11, in the robot systemaccording to Claim 10, the robot control section includes anamount-of-movement distributing section for distributing, based onremaining amounts to movable limits of individual joints of the handsection or the arm section, amounts of movement of the individual partsof the robot used to move the object when the object is held and moved.

Advantages

According to the invention set forth in Claim 1, the size and shape ofan object to be held is recognized from image information, holding isexecuted using a method determined, and the holding method is correctedusing information of individual sensors. Thus, it is possible to preventan occurrence of an excessive holding force, so that the risk ofcrushing or dropping the object is alleviated. Accordingly, it ispossible to hold an object stably by an optimum holding method andholding force.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 2, inherentattribute information regarding an object is stored as object data whenthe object is held, and the object data is maintained. Thus, it ispossible to skip processing for determining a holding method at the nextoccasion of holding. This serves to increase the speed of processing forthe proposed holding method.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 3, one ormore pieces of data regarding the object, such as a size, shape, mass,or shade of the object, and data regarding a holding method are storedas object data when the object is held, and the object data ismaintained. Thus, it is possible to skip processing for determining aholding method at the next occasion of holding. This serves to increasethe speed of processing for proposing a holding method.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 4, a forcesensor for measuring a load on the trunk section and an arm-sectionforce sensor for measuring a load on the arm section are provided. Thus,when the object is held by embracing, it is possible to controlembracing force by measuring the force on the trunk section and the loadon the arm section. Accordingly, it is possible to hold the object moresafely and stably by an optimum holding force.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 5, it ispossible to avoid holding the object at an unreasonable posture orposition. Thus, it is possible to hold the object more stably andsafely.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 6, since amoving mechanism is provided, it is possible to prevent interferencebetween the object and the hand section when the hand section is movedto a holding position.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 7, if it isclearly not possible to hold an object, an attempt to hold the object isrefrained, and it is indicated that holding is not possible. This servesto avoid danger.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 8, an objectto be held is recognized from an ID tag provided on the object. Thus, itis possible to recognize the object quickly.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 9, it ispossible to hold the object more safely and stably by an optimum holdingmethod.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 10, it ispossible to move the object more safely and stably by an optimum methodfor moving the object.

Furthermore, according to the invention set forth in Claim 11, it ispossible to move the object safely and stably by an optimum method formoving the object while avoiding unreasonable posture of the robot.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an overall configuration diagram showing the configuration ofa robot according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a configuration diagram of a robot control section in a robotsystem according to the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of a robot systemaccording to a first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart for explaining a detailed operation of the robotsystem according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram regarding holding with three fingers ofone hand, which is a holding method in the robot system according to thepresent invention.

FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram regarding holding with five fingers ofone hand, which is a holding method in the robot system according to thepresent invention.

FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram regarding holding with entire one hand,which is a holding method in the robot system according to the presentinvention.

FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram regarding holding with entire bothhands, which is a holding method in the robot system according to thepresent invention.

FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram regarding holding with entire botharms, i.e., embracing, which is a holding method in the robot systemaccording to the present invention.

FIG. 10 is a configuration diagram of a robot system according to asecond embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of the robot systemaccording to the second embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of a robot systemaccording to a third embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 13 is a configuration diagram of a robot control section in a robotsystem according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of the robot systemaccording to the fourth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 15 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of a robot systemaccording to a fifth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 16 is a configuration diagram of a robot control section in a robotsystem according to a sixth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 17 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of an object movementprocessing section in the robot system according to the sixth embodimentof the present invention.

FIG. 18 is a configuration diagram of a robot control section in a robotsystem according to a seventh embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 19 is an overall configuration diagram of a robot that uses aholding method according to Patent Document 1 showing existing art.

FIG. 20 is a control block diagram of a robot system according to PatentDocument 1 showing existing art.

FIG. 21 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of a robot systemaccording to Patent Document 2 showing existing art.

REFERENCE NUMERALS

-   -   1 hand-section force sensor    -   2 hand section    -   3 arm section    -   4 trunk-section force sensor    -   5 trunk section    -   6 camera    -   7 robot control section    -   8 image processing section    -   9 storage section    -   10 arm-section force sensor    -   11 moving mechanism    -   12 object to be held    -   21 object information calculation section    -   22 holding method determining section    -   23 holding execution section    -   24 sensor information processing section    -   25 holding method correcting section    -   26 indicating section    -   27 object movement processing section    -   28 amount-of-movement distributing section    -   101 robot hand    -   102 sensor signal processing section    -   103 control calculator    -   104 driving section    -   105 force sensor    -   106 position sensor    -   107 touch sensor    -   108 deviation sensor    -   109 target deformation ratio setting    -   110 reaction-force target value setting    -   111 deformation ratio determination    -   112 reaction-force determination

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Now, a specific embodiment of the present invention will be describedwith reference to the drawings.

First Embodiment

FIG. 1 is a overall configuration diagram showing the configuration of arobot according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, 1 denotes a hand section force sensor, 2 denotes ahand section, 3 denotes an arm section, denotes a trunk-section forcesensor, 5 denotes a trunk section, 6 denotes a camera, 7 denotes a robotcontrol section, 8 denotes an image processing section, 10 denotes anarm-section force sensor, and 11 denotes a moving mechanism.

Now, the overall configuration of the robot according to this embodimentwill be described with reference to FIG. 1.

The trunk section 5 of the robot has two arm sections 3, and atrunk-section force sensor 4 that measures the load on the trunk section5. Each of the arm sections 3 has a hand section 2 at the distal endthereof. The hand section 2 has five fingers having a hand-section forcesensor 1 at the distal end thereof. Two cameras 6 provided on the trunksection 5 of the robot measure the shape of an object to be held. Therobot control section 7 controls the movement of the arm sections 3. Theimage processing section 8 of the robot processes images acquired by thecameras 6. The moving mechanism 11 moves the position of the robot.

The trunk-section force sensor 4 may be a sensor other than a forcesensor as long as it is cable of measuring the load on the body in awide range. Furthermore, a sensor that measures the load on a unit otherthan the trunk section 5, for example, the arm sections 3, such as anarm-section force sensor 10, may be used in combination.

FIG. 2 is a configuration diagram of a robot control section in a robotsystem according to the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2, 21 denotes an object information calculationsection, 22 denotes a holding method determining section, 23 denotes aholding execution section, 24 denotes a sensor information processingsection, and 25 denotes a holding method correction section. In FIG. 2,reference numerals that are the same as those in FIG. 1 denote the samecomponents as in FIG. 1, and description thereof will be omitted.

Now, the configuration of the robot control section 7 in the robotsystem according to the present invention will be described withreference to FIG. 2.

Images acquired by the cameras 6 are processed in the image processingsection 8, and the object information calculating section 21 calculatesthe size and shape of an object based on image information from theimage processing section 8. The holding method determining section 22determines a method for holding the object based on object informationfrom the object information calculating section 21. The holdingexecution section 23 controls the arm sections 3 according to theholding method from the holding method determining section 22 to liftthe object. The sensor information processing section 24 processes acombination of one or more items of sensor information during executionof holding to control the holding force. The holding method correctionsection 25 corrects the holding method based on the result of the sensorinformation processing, and corrects the method for holding the object.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing an operation of a robot system accordingto a first embodiment of the present invention.

Now, first, an overview of the operation of the robot system accordingto the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. 3.

First, in step ST1, the object information calculating section 21calculates the size and shape of an object based on images acquired bythe cameras 6.

Then, in step ST2, the holding method determining section 22 tentativelyproposes a holding method in accordance with the calculated size of theobject.

Then, in step ST3, the holding execution section 23 actually holds theobject according to the determined holding method to execute lifting ofthe object.

Then, in step ST4, the sensor information processing section 24 collectsforce and slipping, i.e., information for determining that it is notpossible to hold the object according to the holding method determinedbased on information from force sensors, because of slipping,instability, or the like.

Then, in step ST5, based on the information obtained in step ST4, thesensor information processing section 24 measures the force exerted onthe tip of the fingers when the object is to be held by fingers or handsto control the holding force, and measures the force exerted on thetrunk section when the object is to be held by both arms and control theembracing force.

Finally, in step ST6, the holding method correction section 25determines whether it is possible to hold the object by the holdingmethod determined in step ST2 and the holding force controlled in stepST5. If it is determined that it is not possible to hold the object, theholding method correction section 25 corrects the holding methoddetermined in step ST2, and steps ST2 to ST6 are repeated using thecorrected holding method until it is determined that it is possible tohold the object. If it is determined that it is not possible to hold theobject with the current configuration of the robot, holding is given up.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a detailed operation of the robot systemaccording to the first embodiment of the present invention, whichrelates to the example of the robot having a hand section with fivefingers and two robot arm sections, described earlier and shown in FIG.1.

Furthermore, FIG. 5 is a diagram regarding holding by three fingers ofone hand, which is a holding method in the robot system according to thepresent invention. FIG. 6 is a diagram regarding holding by five fingersof one hand, which is a holding method in the robot system according tothe present invention. FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram regardingholding with entire one hand, which is a holding method in the robotsystem according to the present invention. FIG. 8 is a diagram regardingholding by the entire both hands, which is a holding method in the robotsystem according to the present invention. FIG. 9 is a diagram regardingholding by the entire both arms, i.e., embracing, which is a holdingmethod in the robot system according to the present invention. In FIGS.5, 6, 7, and 8, 12 is an object.

Hereinafter, with reference to FIGS. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, a detailedflow of a holding operation in the robot system according to thisembodiment, from recognition of the size and shape of an object tostable holding, will be described.

In step ST11, the object information calculating section 21 calculatesthe size and shape of the object based on image information acquired bythe cameras 6.

In step ST12, the holding method determining section 22 determineswhether it is possible to hold the object by one hand according to thedimensions and capabilities of arm sections and hand sections, based onthe calculated size and shape of the object.

If it is determined in step ST12 that it is possible to hold the objectby one hand, in step ST13, it is determined if it is possible to holdthe object with three fingers as shown in FIG. 5. If it is determined instep ST13 that it is possible to hold the object with three fingers, instep ST14, “hold with three fingers” is selected as a determined holdingmethod. If it is determined in step ST13 that it is not possible to holdthe object with three fingers, in step ST15, it is determined based onthe image information whether it is possible to hold the object withfive fingers as shown in FIG. 6. If it is determined in step ST15 thatit is possible to hold the object with five fingers, in step ST16, “holdwith five fingers” is selected as a determined holding method. If it isdetermined in step ST15 that it is not possible to hold the object withfive fingers, i.e., that it is necessary to hold the object with theentire one hand, in step ST17, “hold with the entire one hand” isselected as a determined holding method as shown in FIG. 7.

On the other hand, if it is determined in step ST12, described earlier,that it is not possible to hold the object with one hand, in step ST18,it is determined whether it is possible to hold the object with bothhands as shown in FIG. 8. If it is determined in step ST18 that it ispossible to hold the object with both hands, in step 19, “hold with bothhands” is selected as a determined holding method. On the other hand, ifit is determined in step ST18 that it is not possible to hold the objectwith both hands, i.e., that it is necessary to hold the object with theentire both arms, in step ST20, “hold with the entire both arms” shownin FIG. 9, i.e., embracing, is selected as a determined holding method.

The holding execution section 23 actually executes holding by theholding method determined by the holding method determining section 22through the procedure of steps ST 11 to 20 described above. Based onreaction force and slipping of sensor units measured by individualsensors, the sensor information processing section 24 controls theholding force using sensor information regarding whether the determinedholding method is valid, i.e., whether it is possible to hold theobject. If it is determined that the holding force is weak, the holdingmethod correction section 25 corrects the holding method to a holdingmethod that is one level above. That is, if holding with three fingershas been tentatively proposed, in step ST21, a holding method with fivefingers is proposed. If holding with five fingers has been tentativelyproposed, in step ST22, holding with the entire one hand is proposed. Ifholding with the entire one hand has been tentatively proposed, in stepST23, holding with both hands is proposed. If holding with both handshas been tentatively proposed, in step ST24, the holding method iscorrected to holding with both arms, i.e., embracing.

The correction through steps ST 21 to 24 is repeated until it isdetermined that it is possible to hold the object according to valuesmeasured by individual sensors, and holding is actually executed.

At this time, in the case of a holding method other than holding withboth arms, i.e., embracing, in step ST26, the force exerted on the handsection force sensor 1 is measured, and the holding force is controlledto become a necessary minimum holding force. When the object is heldwith both arms, in step ST27, the force exerted on the trunk section ismeasured by the trunk section force sensor 4, and the holding force iscontrolled to become a necessary minimum holding force, i.e., embracingforce. If it is not possible to hold the object even with both arms, instep ST25, it is determined that it is not possible to hold the object.

With the configuration and operation described above, in the robotsystem according to this embodiment, it is possible to prevent anoccurrence of an excessive holding force. This alleviates the risk ofcrushing or dropping the object. Thus, it is possible to hold the objectstably with an optimum holding method and holding force.

Second Embodiment

FIG. 10 is a configuration diagram of a robot system according to asecond embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 10, 9 denotes a storage unit. Reference numerals thatare the same as those in FIG. 1 denote the same components as in FIG. 1,and description thereof will be omitted.

This embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that the robotsystem according to this embodiment includes a storage unit that storesand maintains, as object data, specific attribute information regardingthe object when the object is held, i.e., one or more items of dataregarding the object, such as the size, shape, mass, or intensity levelof the object, and the holding method.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an operation of the robot systemaccording to the second embodiment of the present invention. The samestep ST numbers as those in FIG. 4 denote the same processing steps asin FIG. 4. The operation of the robot system according to thisembodiment differs from that in the first embodiment in that steps ST31and 32 described below are provided before step ST11 in the firstembodiment.

Now, the operation of the robot system according to this embodiment willbe described with reference to FIG. 11.

First, in step ST31, when the robot has come close to an object to beheld, the robot recognizes the object to be held.

Then, in step ST32, the object recognized in step ST31 is compared withobject data needed to recognize the object, which is stored andmaintained in the storage unit 9 at the time of holding, and it isdetermined whether the object has ever been held previously.

If it is determined as a result of the determination in step ST32 thatthe object has ever been held previously, steps ST11 to ST20 in thefirst embodiment are skipped, then in step ST33, data regarding holdingis retrieved from the object data in the storage unit 9, and theretrieved holding method is determined. The subsequent procedure is thesame as steps ST 21 to 27 in the first embodiment, so that descriptionthereof will be omitted.

On the other hand, if it is determined as a result of the determinationin step ST32 that the object to be held has never been held before,processing that is the same as that in the first embodiment, i.e.,processing in steps ST 11 to 27 shown in FIG. 4, is executed.

As a method for recognizing the object to be held in step ST31, thecameras 6 provided on the robot may be used. Other means may beprovided, for example, an ID-tag reading unit (not shown) may beprovided in the object information calculating section 21 to recognizethe object to be held from an ID tag provided on the object to be held.As long as it is possible to recognize an object to be held, the methodis not limited to the above.

As described above, in the robot system according to this embodiment,information of a held object is stored and maintained in the storageunit 9 at the time of holding, and when an object that has been heldbefore is held, the stored information is retrieved, and the procedureup to determination of a holding method after recognition of the shapeof the object to be held is omitted. Thus, the time taken to hold theobject can be reduced.

Third Embodiment

The configuration of the robot system according to this embodiment isthe same as that in FIGS. 1 and 2 showing the first embodiment, so thatdescription thereof will be omitted.

The robot system according to this embodiment differs from that in thefirst embodiment in that, in this embodiment, step ST41, which is anoperation of determining a position of holding from the size and shapeof an object to be held obtained based on images of the camera 6, isprovided between steps ST11 and ST12 in the first embodiment.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of the robot systemaccording to a third embodiment of the present invention. Steps havingthe same step ST numbers as those in FIG. 4 showing the first embodimentdenotes the same processing steps as those in FIG. 4.

Now, an operation of the robot system according to this embodiment willbe described with reference to FIG. 12.

In step ST11, the size and shape of an object to be held is calculatedbased on images acquired by the cameras 6, and in step ST41, a holdingposition and posture determined as optimum are determined based on thesize and shape. For example, if a grip exists, instead of holding thecenter of gravity of the object, the grip is held. The subsequent stepsare the same as steps ST 12 to 27 in FIG. 4 showing the firstembodiment, so that description thereof will be omitted.

As described above, in the robot system according to this embodiment,the position and posture at the time of holding an object is determinedbased on the size and object of the object to be held. Thus, it ispossible to avoid holding the object at an unreasonable posture orposition, so that it is possible to hold an object more stably with lessholding force compared with holding the object arbitrarily.

Fourth Embodiment

FIG. 13 is a configuration diagram of a robot control section in a robotsystem according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention.

In FIG. 13, 26 denotes an indicating section. Reference numerals thatare the same as those in FIGS. 1 and 2 showing the first embodimentdenote components that are the same as those in FIGS. 1 and 2, anddescription thereof will be omitted.

A feature of this embodiment is as follows.

That is, the robot control section 7 in the robot system according tothis embodiment includes the indicating section 26 for determiningwhether it is possible to hold an object based on object information,and for indicating that holding is not possible when it is determinedthat holding is not possible.

FIG. 14 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of the robot systemaccording to the fourth embodiment of the present invention. Step STnumbers that are the same as those in FIG. 4 showing the firstembodiment denote processing steps that are the same as those in FIG. 4.

Now, an operation of the robot system according to this embodiment willbe described with reference to FIG. 14.

After calculating the size and shape of an object to be held based onimages acquired by the cameras 6 in step 11, in step ST51, it isdetermined based on the size and shape of the object to be held whetherit is possible to hold the object with both arms. If it is determinedthat holding is not possible even with both arms, determination of aholding method and execution of holding are refrained, i.e., processingoperations in steps ST12 to ST27 are not executed, and it is indicatedin step ST52 that holding is not possible.

The method of indication by the indicating section 26 is not limited aslong as it is not dangerous, and may be the issuance of an alarm sound,an operation indicating that holding is not possible, or the like.

As described above, according to the robot system according to thisembodiment, if it is determined that it is not possible to hold anobject to be held, determination of a holding method and execution ofholding are refrained. Thus, it is possible to reduce processing timefrom recognition of the object to be held to determination that holdingis not possible. Furthermore, if it is clearly not possible to hold anobject, instead of holding the object, it is indicated that holding isnot possible. This serves to avoid danger.

Fifth Embodiment

The configuration of the robot system according to this embodiment isthe same as that in FIGS. 1 and 2 showing the first embodiment, so thatdescription thereof will be omitted.

This embodiment differs from the first embodiment in the followingrespect.

That is, in this embodiment, based on the size and shape of the objectto be held, obtained from the images of the cameras 6, the robot ismoved by the moving mechanism 11 to a position where it is easy to holdthe object. That is, between steps ST11 and ST12 in the firstembodiment, step ST60 of determining whether to move the position of therobot, and step ST61 of moving the position of the robot using themoving mechanism 11 are provided.

FIG. 15 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of the robot systemaccording to the fifth embodiment of the present invention. Step STnumbers that are the same as those in FIG. 4 showing the firstembodiment denote processing steps that are the same as those in FIG. 4.

Now, an operation of the robot system according to this embodiment willbe described with reference to FIG. 15.

After calculating the size and shape of the object to be held based onimages acquired by the cameras 6 in step ST11, in step ST60, based onthe size and shape, it is determined whether it becomes possible to movethe hand section 2 to a holding position readily and safely by movingthe position of the robot. If it is determined that it becomes possibleto move the hand section 2 readily and safely by moving the position ofthe robot, in step ST61, the position of the robot is moved using themoving mechanism 11. For example, in a case where a small object with alarge specific gravity is to be held, it is safer to hold the object ata position close to the trunk section 5. Thus, after recognizing theobject to be held, the robot is moved closer to the object by using themoving mechanism 11. The subsequent steps are the same as steps ST12 toST27 in FIG. 4 showing the first embodiment, so that description thereofwill be omitted.

As described above, in the robot system according to this embodiment,after recognizing the size and shape of an object to be held, theposition of the robot is adjusted using the moving mechanism 11. Thus,it is possible to prevent interference between the hand section and theobject when the hand section is moved to a holding position.Accordingly, it is possible to hold an object readily and safely.

Sixth Embodiment

FIG. 16 is a configuration diagram of a robot control section in a robotsystem according to a sixth embodiment of the present invention.

In FIG. 16, 27 denotes an object movement processing section. Referencenumerals that are the same as those in FIGS. 1 and 2 showing the firstembodiment denote components that are the same as those in FIGS. 1 and2, and description thereof will be omitted.

A feature of this embodiment is as follows.

That is, the robot control section 7 includes the object movementprocessing section 27 for selecting a part of the robot used formovement, that is, the hand section 2, the arm section 3, or the movingmechanism 11 for moving a main unit of the robot in a case where themoving mechanism 11 is provided, in accordance with an amount ofmovement of the object when the object is held and moved.

FIG. 17 is a flowchart for explaining an operation of the objectmovement processing section in the robot system according to the sixthembodiment of the present invention.

Now, an operation of the object movement processing section 27 in therobot system according to this embodiment will be described withreference to FIG. 17.

While holding is being executed by the holding execution section 23, ifan object moving instruction, such as a disturbance avoidinginstruction, is received based on, for example, information from ateaching pendant (not shown) or the sensor information processingsection 24, in step ST1001, it is determined whether the execution ofholding is an operation in which holding has been finished. If holdinghas not been finished, the sensor information processing section 24controls holding force based on sensor information from the individualsensors, and the holding method correction section 25 corrects theholding method if it is determined that the holding method must becorrected. If it is determined in step ST1001 that the execution ofholding is an operation in which holding has been finished, in stepST1002, it is determined whether the amount of movement according to theinstruction for moving the object, received earlier, can be dealt withby the hand section 2 alone. If the amount of movement does not exceedthe movable range of the hand section 2, in step ST1003, the object heldis moved by the hand section 2 alone. If the amount of movement exceedsthe movable range of the hand section 2, in step ST1004, it isdetermined whether the amount of movement according to the instructionfor moving the object, received earlier, can be dealt with by the armsection 3 alone. If the amount of movement does not exceed the movablerange of the arm section 3, in step ST1005, the object held is moved bythe arm section 3 alone. If the amount of movement exceeds the movablerange of the arm section 3, in step ST1006, the object held is moved bythe moving mechanism 11.

As described above, in the robot system according to this embodiment,upon receiving an instruction for moving an object while the object isheld, moving means is determined in consideration of movable ranges ofindividual moving means. Thus, it is possible to move a held objectsafely and stably by an optimum method of moving the object.

Seventh Embodiment

FIG. 18 is a configuration diagram of a robot control section in a robotsystem according to a seventh embodiment of the present invention.

In FIG. 18, 28 denotes an amount-of-movement distributing section.Reference numerals that are the same as those in FIG. 16 showing thesixth embodiment denote components that are the same as those in FIG.16, and description thereof will be omitted.

This embodiment differs from the sixth embodiment in the followingrespect.

That is, the robot control section 7 in this embodiment includes theamount-of-movement distributing section 28 for distributing, based onremaining amounts to movable limits of individual joints of the handsection 2 and/or the arm section 3, amounts of movement of theindividual parts of the robot used to move the object when the object isheld and moved.

Now, an operation of the amount-of-movement distributing section 28 inthe robot system according to this embodiment will be described withreference to FIG. 18.

Upon the robot control section 7 receiving an instruction for moving aheld object, the amount-of-movement distributing section 28 distributesthe amounts of movement of the individual parts, processed by the objectmovement processing section 27, to the individual parts so that theindividual parts can deal with the amounts of movement, with prioritygiven to parts having margins with reference to movable limits. Forexample, if, in a certain holding posture, the amount of movement of theheld object instructed is 15 mm, the hand section has a margin of 20 mmwith reference to the movable limit, and the arm section has a margin of10 mm with reference to the movable limit, the hand section is moved by10 mm and the arm section is moved by 5 mm.

As described above, in the robot system according to this embodiment,upon receiving an instruction for moving a held object, the amounts ofmovement is distributed to the individual parts so that the individualparts can deal with the amounts of movement. Thus, it is possible tomove a held object safely and stably by an optimum method of moving theobject while avoiding an unreasonable posture of the robot.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

In a robot system according to the present invention, a holding methodis determined using camera images and sensor information at the tips offingers or at a trunk section. Thus, it is possible to avoid occurrenceof an excessive holding power. Accordingly, application is possible to arobot apparatus that works in cooperation with a human.

1. A robot system comprising: a hand section having a finger with a hand-section force sensor provided at a distal end thereof; one or more arm sections having the hand section at a distal end thereof; a trunk section having the arm sections and on which a trunk-section force sensor is provided; a camera for measuring a shape of an object; a robot control section for controlling movement of the arm sections; and an image processing section for processing an image acquired by the camera; wherein the robot control section includes: an object information calculating section for calculating, based on image information from the image processing section, a size and shape of the object to be held; a holding method determining section for determining, based on the object information calculated, a method for holding the object; a holding execution section for executing lifting of the object by the holding method determined; a sensor information processing section for processing pieces of sensor information and controlling holding force, the pieces of sensor information being those obtained at a time of the execution, and the processing of the pieces of sensor information being made for each combination of one or more of the pieces of information; and a holding method correction section for correcting, based on a result of the sensor information processing, the method for holding the object.
 2. The robot system according to claim 1, comprising a storage section for storing inherent attribute information regarding the object as object data when the object is held, and maintaining the object data.
 3. The robot system according to claim 2, wherein the object data stored in the storage section when the object is held is one or more pieces of data regarding the object, such as a size, shape, mass, or shade of the object, and data regarding a holding method.
 4. The robot system according to claim 1, wherein the arm section (3) includes: an arm-section force sensor for measuring a load on the arm section, and wherein the robot control section controls holding force by using the arm-section force sensor in combination with the trunk-section force sensor.
 5. The robot system according to claim 1, wherein the holding method determining section calculates a holding position of the object to be held and determines a holding method based on the object information calculated by the object information calculation section.
 6. A robot system comprising: a hand section having a finger with a hand-section force sensor provided at a distal end thereof; one or more arm sections having the hand section at a distal end thereof; a trunk section having the arm sections and on which a trunk-section force sensor is provided; a camera for measuring a shape of an object; and a moving mechanism for moving, based on the size and shape of the object, obtained from the image of the camera, the object to be held to a position where it is easy to hold the object.
 7. The robot system according to claim 1, wherein the robot control section includes: an indicating section for determining, based on the object information, whether it is possible to hold the object, and for indicating that holding is not possible when it is determined that holding is not possible.
 8. The robot system according to claim 1, wherein the object information calculation section includes: an ID tag reading section for recognizing the object to be held from an ID tag provided on the object.
 9. The robot system according to claim 1, wherein the method for holding the object, executed by the holding execution section, is: holding with three fingers of one hand, holding with five fingers of one hand, or holding with entire one hand in a case where the number of the arm sections provided, having the hand section with five fingers, is one, and holding with three fingers of one hand, holding with five fingers of one hand, holding with entire one hand, holding with entire both hands, or holding with entire both arms in a case where the number of the arm sections provided, having the hand section with five fingers, is two.
 10. The robot system according to claim 1, wherein the robot control section includes: an object movement processing section for selecting a part of the robot used for movement, that is, the hand section, the arm section, or a moving mechanism for moving a main unit of the robot in a case where the moving mechanism is provided, in accordance with an amount of movement of the object when the object is held and moved.
 11. A robot system comprising: a hand section having a finger with a hand-section force sensor provided at a distal end thereof; one or more arm sections having the hand section at a distal end thereof; a trunk section having the arm sections and on which a trunk-section force sensor is provided; a camera for measuring a shape of an object; and a robot control section having an amount-of-movement distributing section for distributing, based on remaining amounts to movable limits of individual joints of the hand section or the arm section, amounts of movement of the individual parts of the robot used to move the object when the object is held and moved. 